Crawford Not Violated Because Statement Not Admitted for Its Truth; Statment Was Relevant for Its Truth, However, Since Defense Raised It. Clear?
U.S. v. Paulino, Docket No. 04-2553-cr (2d Cir. March 29, 2006) (Oakes, Raggi, Wesley): Having decided a routine Crawford issue in U.S. v. Snype, the Court, again by Judge Raggi, turns in this case to a more complicated situation. The case raises the interesting question whether a court’s instruction to a jury that a hearsay … Read more