Johnson Held Substantive and Retroactive in the Fourth Circuit
Today, the Fourth Circuit held that Johnson is substantive and retroactive as applied to the Guidelines. You can read the decision in Hubbard here.
Today, the Fourth Circuit held that Johnson is substantive and retroactive as applied to the Guidelines. You can read the decision in Hubbard here.
After this week’s Supreme Court decision in Welch v. United States, — S. Ct. –, slip op. (April 18, 2016) (No. 15-6418), which found that Johnson v. United States, 135 S. Ct. 2551 (2015) is retroactive to those serving Armed Career Criminal sentences, the next big question is whether the rule in Johnson will apply … Read more
In last year’s Johnson v. United States, the Supreme Court held the residual clause of the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA) void for vagueness. In today’s Welch v. United States, the Supreme Court held Johnson applies retroactively. Only Justice Thomas dissented. This means defendants serving final sentences — meaning ones previously affirmed on appeal — are now eligible for … Read more
United States v. Diaz, No. 10-317 (2d Cir. December 15, 2010) (Cabranes, Pooler, Wesley, CJJ) (per curiam) In October, the court issued a non-precedential summary order holding that the Fair Sentencing Act (the “FSA”) is not retroactive. See “Summary Summary” posted October 27, 2010. This per curiam is a published opinion to the same effect, … Read more